Follow the Money. More Obama Crony Capitalism

It is amazing how Democrats flocked to Obama thinking they were getting a man of the people.  A transparent administration that will be a shining example of integrity and honest government. What they got instead is the most corrupt administration in presidential history.  Obama will be the wealthiest ex-president ever with the line up of Wall Street financiers and mega wealthy corporate captains of industry that he has cowed to.

The Washington Post can't even overlook at least one obvious example. The Clean Energy scam is on.

Overall, the Post found that $3.9 billion in federal grants and financing flowed to 21 companies backed by firms with connections to five Obama administration staffers and advisers.

This news, plus the embarassing Solyndra half-billion dollar loss (a loan that the Bush Administration saw as bad financial practice) is merely the tiny tip of a giant iceberg called "The 870 Billion Dollar Stimulus, Where Did it Actually Go?" .  Someday we'll get the details.  But not now, not from this media.

Another Obama Media Lieutenant David Gregory Reports for Duty

David Gregory, host of Meet the Press for NBC, couldn't  hold Tim Russert's jockstrap.  Gregory spends each Sunday morning asking the awkward questions of anybody - candidate or pundit, who would stand in the way of an Obama re-election. Champion of the straw man argument, here's what Gregory decided was a worthy question of Rick Santorum  on a major network television show.

Gregory asked Santorum whether, if elected president, he would only permit single women without children to work in his administration.  That's right: Gregory was actually wondering whether Santorum would prohibit mothers from serving.  Santorum didn't rise to Gregory's absurd bait, giving a smiling and good-natured response to the effect all women would be welcome in a Santorum administration.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2012/02/12/santorum-doesnt-fall-gregorys-bait-banning-working-mothers-his-adm#ixzz1mCx4AqXQ

What a twit.  David Gregory, poster boy for the Main Stream Media's approach to the next 8 months.

The Global Warming Scam Continues to Crumble

Sorry the glaciers and Himalayas are NOT melting. Nevermind.

The world's greatest snow-capped peaks, which run in a chain from the Himalayas to Tian Shan on the border of China and Kyrgyzstan, have lost no ice over the last decade, new research shows.

The discovery has stunned scientists, who had believed that around 50bn tonnes of meltwater were being shed each year and not being replaced by new snowfall.

The ever growing herd of climate change/global warming skeptics have provided reams of research and spoken at thousands of conferences over the last 20 years questioning the entire premise of a warming globe.  And more importantly they have disagreed heartily with the premise that CO2 (the very gas that we exhale) is somehow a toxin that is changing the earth.s climate. The only word that comes to mind is bullshit.

Oh, and the polar ice caps are also not melting even as the CO2 gas increases in the atmosphere.

While vast quantities of ice melting into the ocean is not exactly good news, Wahr says, according to his team's estimates, about 30 percent less ice is melting than previously thought.

More Proof That Climate Change is a Big Scam

At the NOAA- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association they are deep into climate change.
Their very existence apparently depends on us all "believing" in the religion of Anthropogenic Global Warming.

Here's a "survey" the NOAA circulates to its employees.  I wonder what the message is?

How likely are you to keep your job if the public is informed that climate change will not affect them or their descendents in a negative manner?

Best climate site on the innertubes, WUWT, has the full story

CBS News Does the DNC's Bidding for 12 Minutes

The CBS Evening news with Scott Pelley last night was absolutely laughable in its ham-handed bias towards Romney.  First 12 minutes were spent enlightening the audience on Romney's supposed gaffe about his lack of concern for "the very poor".  Out of context the quote is a tough one for Mitt and we were treated by CBS with an out of context version first (with a poorly truncated edit). On and on the story went with comments from Gingrich, various Dems and chastisement from the reporter in the field.  We also got a little collage of Romney's other "insensitive" comments all rolled into one.  The next "story" was about how Romney and his SuperPacs are collecting millions to buy the election....After 12 minutes of this we get a :40 story about how Obama was out trying to fix the mortgage crisis with a new "plan".

At 6:30PM each weeknight the big three roll out their 30 minute evening news programs on the East Coast.  I have this vision of Obama, Axelrod and the adoring Obamanites all clinking Scotch filled tumblers as they laugh and smile at each other while the networks try to outdo each other in their bastardizing of broadcast journalism for the sake of BHO.

Jake Tapper of ABC news was right when he said "the media tilted the scales toward Obama in 2008".  This time around they're already sitting on the scales and the public is getting ripped off far worse.

It's 2 against 1. The Democrats and the Media against the Republicans.

The White House Enemies List

For those who believe Mitt Romney should lighten up his defense of attacks from his Republican rivals understand this: Obama and his election team will stop at nothing to win.  They and the media "who tilt the scales" in Obama's favor will employ every tactic - honest or dishonest to keep Obama in office.  Romney is toughening himself up and needs to get stronger every day.

What would you do if the White House engaged in derogatory speculative innuendo about the integrity of your tax returns? Suppose also that the president's surrogates and allies in the media regularly attacked you, sullied your reputation and questioned your integrity. On top of all of that, what if a leading member of the president's party in Congress demanded your appearance before a congressional committee this week so that you could be interrogated about the Keystone XL oil pipeline project in which you have repeatedly—and accurately—stated that you have no involvement?

Ted Olsen is shedding light on the enemies list that Axelrod, Obama et al have developed and are continuing to develop to bring down honest US citizens in order to create the bogeymen that this group of Dems feel is necessary to bring out the vote against the Republican candidate.